edoc

Ultrasound in managing extrapulmonary tuberculosis: a randomised, controlled, parallel, superiority, open-label trial

Ndege, R. and Ngome, O. and Vanobberghen, F. and Bani, F. and Temba, Y. and Wilson, H. and Hella, J. and Gingo, W. and Sasamalo, M. and Mnzava, D. and Kimera, N. and Hiza, H. and Wigayi, J. and Mapesi, H. and Kato, I. B. and Mhimbira, F. and Reither, K. and Battegay, M. and Paris, D. H. and Weisser, M. and Rohacek, M.. (2022) Ultrasound in managing extrapulmonary tuberculosis: a randomised, controlled, parallel, superiority, open-label trial. Clinical infectious diseases (in press). not yet available.

[img] PDF
Restricted to Repository staff only

684Kb

Official URL: https://edoc.unibas.ch/90960/

Downloads: Statistics Overview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with suspected extrapulmonary tuberculosis are often treated empirically. We hypothesized that extended Focused Assessment of Sonography for HIV and Tuberculosis (eFASH), in combination with other tests, would increase the proportion of correctly managed patients with suspected extrapulmonary tuberculosis. METHODS: This trial in adults with suspected extrapulmonary tuberculosis was performed in a rural and an urban hospital in Tanzania. Participants were randomised 1:1 to intervention or routine care, stratified by site and HIV status. All participants received a clinical evaluation, chest X-ray, sputum Xpert MTB/RIF, and urine Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra. The intervention was a management algorithm based on eFASH plus microbiology, adenosine deaminase (ADA) and chest X-ray. The primary outcome was the proportion of correctly managed patients. Presence of positive microbiology or ADA defined definite tuberculosis. An independent endpoint review committee determined diagnoses of probable or no tuberculosis. We evaluated outcomes using logistic regression models, adjusted for randomisation stratification factors. RESULTS: From 09/2018 to 10/2020, 1,036 patients were screened and 701 randomised (350 intervention, 351 control). 251 (72%) intervention participants had a positive eFASH. 258 (74%) intervention and 227 (65%) control participants were initiated anti-tuberculosis treatment at baseline. More intervention participants had definite tuberculosis (n = 124, 35%) compared to controls (n = 85, 24%). There was no difference between groups for the primary outcome (intervention 266/286 (93%); control: 245/266 (92%); odds ratio 1.14 (95% confidence interval 0.60-2.16, p = 0.68)). There were no procedure-associated adverse events. CONCLUSION: eFASH did not change the proportion of correctly managed patients, but increased the proportion of definite tuberculosis.
Faculties and Departments:09 Associated Institutions > Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH)
09 Associated Institutions > Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH) > Department of Medicine (MED)
09 Associated Institutions > Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH) > Department of Medicine (MED) > Clinical Research (Reither)
03 Faculty of Medicine > Departement Public Health > Sozial- und Präventivmedizin > Medicines Development (Paris)
09 Associated Institutions > Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH) > Department of Medicine (MED) > Medicines Development (Paris)
09 Associated Institutions > Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH) > Department of Medicine (MED) > Clinical Statistics and Data Management (Glass)
UniBasel Contributors:Vanobberghen, Alexandre and Mapesi, Herry and Reither, Klaus and Paris, Daniel Henry and Weisser, Maja and Rohacek, Martin and Battegay, Manuel E. and Ndege, Robert
Item Type:Article, refereed
Article Subtype:Research Article
ISSN:1058-4838
Note:Publication type according to Uni Basel Research Database: Journal article
Language:English
Related URLs:
Identification Number:
edoc DOI:
Last Modified:14 Apr 2023 03:10
Deposited On:27 Dec 2022 16:11

Repository Staff Only: item control page