edoc

Frequency of a positive family history of colorectal cancer in general practice: a cross-sectional study

Plath, Jasper and Siebenhofer, Andrea and Koné, Insa and Hechtner, Marlene and Schulz-Rothe, Sylvia and Beyer, Martin and Gerlach, Ferdinand M. and Guethlin, Corina. (2017) Frequency of a positive family history of colorectal cancer in general practice: a cross-sectional study. Family Practice, 34 (1). pp. 30-35.

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: https://edoc.unibas.ch/66915/

Downloads: Statistics Overview

Abstract

Evidence on the frequency of a positive family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) among individuals aged <55 years is lacking. General practice setting might be well suited for the identification of individuals in this above-average risk group.; To determine the frequency of a reported positive family history of CRC among patients aged 40 to 54 years in a general practice setting.; We conducted a cross-sectional study in 21 general practices in Germany. Patients aged 40 to 54 years were identified by means of the practice software and interviewed by health care assistants using a standardized four-item questionnaire. Outcome was occurrence of a positive family history of CRC, defined as at least one first-degree relative (FDR: parents, siblings, or children) with CRC. Further measurements were FDRs with CRC / colorectal polyps (adenomas) diagnosed before the age of 50 and occurrence of three or more relatives with colorectal, stomach, cervical, ovarian, urethel or renal pelvic cancer.; Out of 6723 participants, 7.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.6% to 7.8%) reported at least one FDR with CRC and 1.2% (95% CI 0.9% to 1.5%) reported FDRs with CRC diagnosed before the age of 50. A further 2.6% (95% CI 2.3% to 3.0%) reported colorectal polyps in FDRs diagnosed before the age of 50 and 2.1% (95% CI 1.8% to 2.5%) reported three or more relatives with entities mentioned above.; One in 14 patients reported at least one FDR with CRC. General practice should be considered when defining requirements of risk-adapted CRC screening.
Faculties and Departments:08 Cross-disciplinary Subjects > Ethik > Institut für Bio- und Medizinethik
UniBasel Contributors:Koné, Insa
Item Type:Article, refereed
Article Subtype:Research Article
Publisher:Oxford University Press
ISSN:0263-2136
e-ISSN:1460-2229
Note:Publication type according to Uni Basel Research Database: Journal article
Identification Number:
Last Modified:11 Feb 2019 15:37
Deposited On:11 Feb 2019 15:37

Repository Staff Only: item control page