Boumediene, F. and Chhour, C. and Chivorakoun, P. and Souvong, V. and Odermatt, P. and Hun, C. and Thebaut, C. and Bounlu, M. and Chum, N. and Vorachit, S. and Ros, S. and Chan, S. and Preux, P. M.. (2020) Community-based management of epilepsy in Southeast Asia: two intervention strategies in Lao PDR and Cambodia. Lancet Reg Health West Pac, 4. p. 100042.
Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: https://edoc.unibas.ch/91046/
Downloads: Statistics Overview
Abstract
Background: Epilepsy affects more than 50 million people worldwide, 80% of whom live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In Southeast Asia, the prevalence is moderate (6 per thousand), and the main public health challenge is reducing the treatment gap, which reaches more than 90% in rural areas. Methods: This 12-month comparative study (intervention vs. control areas) assessed the community effectiveness of two different strategies for the identification and home follow-up of people with epilepsy by Domestic Health Visitors for epilepsy (DHVes). In Lao PDR, DHVes were health center staff covering several villages via monthly visits; in Cambodia, DHVes were health volunteers living in the villages. Findings: At baseline, the treatment gap was >95% in Lao PDR and 100% in Cambodia. After 12 months, the treatment gap in Lao PDR decreased by 5.5% (range: 4.0-12.2) in the intervention area and 0.5% (range: 0.4-0.8) in the control area (p<0.0001). In Cambodia, the treatment gap decreased by 34.9% (range: 29.0-44.1) in the intervention area and 8.1% (range: 6.7-10.2) in the control area (p<0.0001). Among the PWEs followed at home by the DHVes, the proportion adhering to drug treatment was 85.2% in Lao PDR and 78.1% in Cambodia. The cost associated with strategy implemented in Cambodia, compared with the control area, was lower than the cost associated with strategy implemented in Lao PDR." Interpretation: The treatment gap was significantly reduced with both intervention strategies, but the effect was larger in Cambodia. The results of this cost analysis pave the way for scaling-up in rural areas of Lao PDR and Cambodia, and experimental adaptation in other LMICs. Funding: The study was funded by the Global Health Department of Sanofi and Grand Challenges Canada (grant number 0325-04).
Faculties and Departments: | 09 Associated Institutions > Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH) 09 Associated Institutions > Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH) > Department of Epidemiology and Public Health (EPH) > Eco System Health Sciences > Helminths and Health (Odermatt) |
---|---|
UniBasel Contributors: | Odermatt, Peter |
Item Type: | Article, refereed |
Article Subtype: | Research Article |
ISSN: | 2666-6065 (Electronic)2666-6065 (Linking) |
Note: | Publication type according to Uni Basel Research Database: Journal article |
Related URLs: | |
Identification Number: |
|
Last Modified: | 27 Dec 2022 16:19 |
Deposited On: | 27 Dec 2022 16:19 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page