Microplegia versus Cardioplexol® in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery with Minimal Extracorporeal Circulation: Comparison of Two Cardioplegia Concepts

The aim of this study is to compare the combined use of the Myocardial Protection System and our microplegia (Basel Microplegia Protocol) with Cardioplexol; ®; in coronary artery bypass grafting using the minimal extracorporeal circulation.; The analysis focused on propensity score matched pairs of patients in whom microplegia or Cardioplexol; ®; was used. Primary efficacy endpoints were high; -; sensitivity cardiac troponin-T on postoperative day 1 and peak values during hospitalization. Furthermore, we assessed creatine kinase and creatinine kinase-myocardial type, as well as safety endpoints.; A total of 56 patients who received microplegia and 155 patients who received Cardioplexol; ®; were included. The use of the microplegia was associated with significantly lower geometric mean (confidence interval) peak values of high; -; sensitivity cardiac troponin-T (233 ng/L [194-280 ng/L] vs. 362 ng/L [315-416 ng/L];; p; = 0.001), creatinine kinase (539 U/L [458-633 U/L] vs. 719 U/L [645-801 U/L];; p; = 0.011), and creatinine kinase-myocardial type (13.8 µg/L [9.6-19.9 µg/L] vs. 21.6 µg/L [18.9-24.6 µg/L];; p; = 0.026), and a shorter length of stay on the intensive care unit (1.5 days [1.2-1.8 days] vs. 1.9 days [1.7-2.1 days];; p; = 0.011). Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events occurred with roughly equal frequency (1.8 vs. 5.2%;; p; = 0.331).; The use of the Basel Microplegia Protocol was associated with lower peak values of high; -; sensitivity cardiac troponin-T, creatinine kinase, and creatinine kinase-myocardial type and with a shorter length of stay on the intensive care unit, as compared with the use of Cardioplexol; ®; in isolated coronary artery bypass surgery using minimal extracorporeal circulation.