edoc

Development and implementation of a multilevel intervention to improve pain management in Swiss nursing homes

Brunkert, Thekla. Development and implementation of a multilevel intervention to improve pain management in Swiss nursing homes. 2019, Doctoral Thesis, University of Basel, Faculty of Medicine.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Available under License CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives).

2626Kb

Official URL: http://edoc.unibas.ch/diss/DissB_13316

Downloads: Statistics Overview

Abstract

Pain is a highly prevalent symptom in older people and particularly among nursing home residents.
Under- or untreated pain can lead to severe physical and psychological consequences, such as
impaired mobility, sleep disturbances and an increase of depressive symptoms. Despite the
availability of evidence-based recommendations for the management of geriatric pain, pain
management in nursing homes remains a persistent issue. Various barriers on the level of residents,
care workers and the organizations have been reported to hinder adequate pain management. One
critical aspect in this regard are common negative beliefs about pain and its management in older
people, particularly in residents with cognitive impairment.
Previous studies to improve the adoption of evidence-based pain management in nursing homes
showed mixed results. Yet, few studies have systematically investigated the factors contributing
to the difficulties in implementation. Implementation science highlights the critical role of
contextual factors in implementing new practices. Knowledge of the local hindering and
facilitating factors towards the new practice, hence, is crucial to develop and select appropriate
strategies to facilitate implementation and to help interpretation of varying implementation
success.
The overall aim of this dissertation was to develop and implement a multilevel intervention to
improve pain management in a group of Swiss nursing homes. Therefore, in the first phase, a
comprehensive analysis of the implementation context, incorporating perspectives of care workers
and residents was conducted. Based on these insights, in the second phase, a multilevel
intervention and implementation strategies were developed and evaluated in a subsample of
nursing homes.
This dissertation is embedded in the ProQuaS (Identification and development of interfaces and
Processes to improve Quality of life of residents at Senevita) study, a three- years mixed-methods
study focusing on potentially avoidable hospitalizations and pain management in nursing home
residents. The ProQuaS project is conducted in the institutions of Senevita AG, a privately-owned
nursing home group in Switzerland, with currently 26 institutions providing assisted-living and
long-term care. This dissertation focuses on the pain management aspects of the overall project.
Overall, this dissertation is structured in eight chapters. Chapters 1 and 2 provide an overview of
the topic and state the aims of this dissertation.11
Chapter 1 provides a general introduction to the field of pain management in nursing homes,
including an overview of the state of the science in pain management practice and interventions to
improve pain management in NHs. Furthermore, a short introduction to principles of
implementation science, the Swiss NH context in general and the ProQuaS project in specific, are
provided. Chapter 2 describes the aims of this dissertation.
The articles presented in Chapters 3 and 4 constitute the findings of the contextual analysis, which
has been conducted in the first phase of ProQuaS. Chapter 3 reports a mixed-methods study,
which integrated data of care worker surveys and focus group discussions to identify facilitating
and hindering factors for pain management in nursing homes. The capability-opportunitymotivation determine behavior (COM-B) model was used to discuss implications for the selection
and development of implementation strategies. Results from the questionnaire survey indicate, that
lacking availability (60.9%) and application of non-pharmacological treatment (53.6%);
reluctance of residents to report pain (51.1%) and lack of time for a comprehensive pain assessment
(50.5%) are perceived to be the major barriers to pain management. Focus group discussions
corroborated and extended the quantitative findings with facilitators, e.g., joint ward rounds with
physicians, good knowledge of the resident, and further barriers, including high turnover and
lacking established routines. The findings suggest that implementation strategies should aim at
increasing pain management knowledge and foster motivational aspects to sustainable change in
pain management practice, while at the same time factoring in contextual factors, such as high
turnover.
Chapter 4 reports a qualitative study describing nursing home residents’ perceptions of barriers
and facilitators and their needs regarding pain management. We identified three central themes
from the data: dealing with major life changes, managing pain, and using formal care. Overall, the
interviews highlighted the multidimensionality of NH residents’ pain experience and their
corresponding needs. Participants perceived that care workers were not always able to respond
adequately to these needs. Instead, participants indicated to have learned to cope with their pain
using self-developed strategies and by directly consulting their physicians. These findings
emphasize our findings of Chapter 3. Amongst others, strategies to improve pain management in
nursing homes need to address prevailing attitudes and shortages in knowledge concerning pain12
management in older people. Creating a common understanding of the biopsychosocial and
spiritual dimensions of pain is crucial to enable the provision of person- centered pain
management.
Chapter 5 comprises the study protocol of the second part of the ProQuaS study. It provides a
detailed overview of the intervention and implementation strategies and the evaluation plan for the
outlined hybrid II effectiveness- implementation study. Furthermore, the conceptual framework of
ProQuaS is presented- highlighting potential associations between the intervention,
implementation strategies, contextual/individual factors and outcomes. The conceptual model is
based on the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Theoretical
Domains Framework to provide a comprehensive understanding of facilitating and hindering
factors. The intervention consists of a pain management guideline which has been derived from
international recommendations to geriatric pain management and was adapted to the nursing
homes’ context in collaboration with a group of stakeholder from the participating nursing homes.
The central implementation strategies are interactive training workshops for care workers of all
levels and the training and introduction of pain champions on the participating wards. Additionally
supporting strategies encompass preparatory and ongoing meetings with the nursing homes’
leadership, adaptions of the residents’ documentation software and the provision of cardboard pain
assessment scales and printed copies of the pain management guidelines on the wards.
The articles presented in Chapters 6 and 7 constitute the evaluation of the intervention and its
implementation with regard to the residents and care workers. Chapter 6 reports the effectiveness
of the intervention on pain- related resident outcomes and the utility of implementation strategies
with regard to the intervention’s reach and acceptability. Using a quasi-experimental pre-post
design with one pre- and two post- measures at three and six months after baseline, we could show
that all pain-related resident outcomes improved over time. In a self-report subsample (n= 43),
changes in intensity of average pain were significant at three months, and changes in intensity of
worst pain were significant at three and six months. In addition, we looked at reach and
acceptability of the intervention as perceived by care workers and found that about 76% of care
workers were familiar with the guideline, 70.4% answered that the guideline is practical and
correlates with their ideas of good pain assessment (75.9 %) and treatment (79.7 %). These findings13
suggest, that our approach implementing a pain management guideline using interactive training
workshops and introducing trained pain champions could partially improve residents’ pain-related
outcomes. However, a process evaluation will provide further insights into the underlying
mechanisms and potential barriers of the implementation process.
Chapter 7 reports a quantitative process evaluation that explores the mechanisms of change
related to our implementation strategies. Based on the conceptual framework of ProQuaS
presented in Chapter 5 we hypothesized that by conducting training workshops and introducing
pain champions on the wards, we would increase care workers’ self- efficacy in pain management.
Furthermore, we hypothesized that self- efficacy in pain management is associated with adoption
of the implemented pain management guideline. To test our hypotheses, we used data of the care
worker questionnaire survey which was conducted at baseline, after three and six months. Our
findings show that care workers’ self- efficacy in pain management at three and six months was
significantly higher compared to baseline. Self-reported adoption of the pain management
guidelines was mixed, depending on the core component between 44% and 73%. We found
significant associations between care workers’ self-efficacy and adoption of two core components:
‘conducting a comprehensive assessment’ and ‘use of PAINAD’. There were no significant
associations with the components ‘documentation’ and ‘re-evaluation’, though. These findings
suggest that our strategies might have increased care workers’ self-efficacy, however with regard
to adoption, self- efficacy might not be the only contributing factor. Documentation and reevaluation of residents’ pain after (non-)pharmacological treatment might rather depend on
memory processes. Our findings emphasize the importance of continuous commitment of internal
facilitators, e.g., pain champions, to drive implementation efforts.
Chapter 8, ultimately synthesizes and discusses major findings of all studies in the context of the
literature. Furthermore, strengths and weaknesses of the studies are discussed, and implications
for future research and practice are presented. This dissertation contributes to the current literature
in the field of pain management in nursing homes by using implementation science principles and
behavioral theory to improve understanding of implementation challenges. Translation of this
knowledge is facilitated by the detailed description of the local context, including determinants of
change in pain management, on the one hand and the implementation strategies on the other hand.
Advisors:Simon, Michael and Zúñiga, Franziska and Ruppen, Wilhelm
Faculties and Departments:03 Faculty of Medicine > Departement Public Health > Institut für Pflegewissenschaft > Pflegewissenschaft (Simon)
UniBasel Contributors:Brunkert, Thekla and Simon, Michael and Zuniga, Franziska
Item Type:Thesis
Thesis Subtype:Doctoral Thesis
Thesis no:13316
Thesis status:Complete
Bibsysno:Link to catalogue
Number of Pages:1 Online-Ressource (172 Seiten)
Language:English
Identification Number:
Last Modified:07 Nov 2019 05:30
Deposited On:06 Nov 2019 16:43

Repository Staff Only: item control page