edoc

The German version of the high-performance work systems questionnaire (HPWS-G) in the context of patient safety: a validation study in a Swiss university hospital

Mielke, Juliane and De Geest, Sabina and Beckmann, Sonja and Leppla, Lynn and Luta, Xhyljeta and Guerbaai, Raphaelle-Ashley and Hunziker, Sabina and Schwendimann, Rene. (2019) The German version of the high-performance work systems questionnaire (HPWS-G) in the context of patient safety: a validation study in a Swiss university hospital. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 19. ARTN356.

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: https://edoc.unibas.ch/71347/

Downloads: Statistics Overview

Abstract

BackgroundHigh performance work systems (HPWSs) are successful work systems in the context of safety climate and patient safety. The 10-item HPWS questionnaire is a validated instrument developed to assess existing HPWS structures in hospitals. The objectives of this cross-sectional study were to translate the English HPWS questionnaire into German (HPWS-G), to rate its content validity, and to examine its psychometric properties.MethodsContent validity was examined by a panel of 12 physicians and nurses, and I-CVI and S-CVI calculated. For internal consistency, Cronbach's and item-scale correlations were determined. Construct validity was measured via confirmatory factor analysis.A convenience sample of 782 nurses and physicians in a University hospital setting in Switzerland's German-speaking region was surveyed. Four inclusion criteria were applied: working in intensive care, emergency department or operating room; having daily patient contact; having worked in the current clinical area for more than three months; and more than 40% employment.ResultsA total of 281 questionnaires were completed (response rate: 35.9%). Overall, the 10-item HPWS-G questionnaire showed good content validity (I-CVI=.83-1; S-CVI=.86) and internal consistency (Cronbach's =.853). HPWS-G scores correlated significantly with safety climate (r(s)=.657, p<.01) and teamwork climate (r(s)=.615, p<.01). The proposed 1-factor model was accepted considering results of applied minimum rank factor analysis; a confirmatory factor analysis indicated an acceptable to good model fit (GFI=.968; CFI=.902; RMSEA=.043).ConclusionsThe HPWS-G showed good psychometric properties. In clinical practice it can be used to assess HPWS practices and for intra- and inter-hospital benchmarking. Some minor adaptions to the wording could be made as well as reassessing the psychometric properties at other clinical sites.
Faculties and Departments:03 Faculty of Medicine > Departement Public Health > Institut für Pflegewissenschaft
03 Faculty of Medicine > Departement Public Health > Institut für Pflegewissenschaft > Pflegewissenschaft (De Geest)
UniBasel Contributors:Mielke, Juliane and De Geest, Sabina M. and Beckmann, Sonja and Leppla, Lynn and Guerbaai, Raphaelle Ashley and Schwendimann, René
Item Type:Article, refereed
Article Subtype:Research Article
Publisher:BMC
ISSN:1472-6963
Note:Publication type according to Uni Basel Research Database: Journal article
Related URLs:
Identification Number:
Last Modified:20 Nov 2019 15:50
Deposited On:06 Nov 2019 08:15

Repository Staff Only: item control page