Items where Author is "Moss, Benjamin"

26 November 2014

Voser, Nathalie and Moss, Benjamin. (2014) Swiss Supreme Court considers application to set aside domestic award for arbitrariness.

29 October 2014

Voser, Nathalie and Moss, Benjamin. (2014) Swiss Supreme Court sets aside domestic arbitral award on grounds of arbitrariness.

24 September 2014

Voser, Nathalie and Moss, Benjamin. (2014) Swiss Supreme Court confirms existing case law on the meaning of arbitrariness in domestic arbitration.

25 July 2014

Voser, Nathalie and Moss, Benjamin. (2014) Swiss Supreme Court sets aside arbitral award on jurisdictional grounds.

28 May 2014

Voser, Nathalie and Moss, Benjamin. (2014) Arbitral tribunal's admission of unlawfully obtained evidence did not violate procedural public policy (Swiss Supreme Court).

26 March 2014

Voser, Nathalie and Moss, Benjamin. (2014) Public policy impact of short-term restrictions on individual's ability to exercise profession (Swiss Supreme Court).

26 February 2014

Voser, Nathalie and Moss, Benjamin. (2014) Parties must pay close attention to specific requirements relating to 30-day deadline for challenging awards.

27 November 2013

Voser, Nathalie and Moss, Benjamin. (2013) Swiss Supreme Court: parties must adhere to specific requirements relating to 30-day deadline to set aside arbitral award.

24 July 2013

Voser, Nathalie and Moss, Benjamin. (2013) Swiss Supreme Court: parties must object promptly to any irregularity in constitution of tribunal.

19 June 2013

Voser, Nathalie and Moss, Benjamin. (2013) Swiss Supreme Court: no review of arbitral tribunal's substantive findings in proceedings to set aside award; rights to be heard and to equal treatment overlap.

6 December 2012

Voser, Nathalie and Moss, Benjamin. (2012) Swiss Supreme Court rejects application to set aside award because tribunal refused to consider related claims in separate arbitral proceedings.

1 November 2012

Voser, Nathalie and Moss, Benjamin. (2012) Swiss Supreme Court examines violation of the right to be heard arising out of arbitral tribunal’s rejection of a party's request for a tribunal-appointed expert.