Repository logo
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Unibas
  3. Publications
  4. Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications
 
  • Details

Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications

Date Issued
2014-01-01
Author(s)
Kasenda, Benjamin  
Schandelmaier, Stefan  
Sun, Xin
von Elm, Erik
You, John
Blümle, Anette
Tomonaga, Yuki
Saccilotto, Ramon  
Amstutz, Alain  
Bengough, Theresa
Meerpohl, Joerg J.
Stegert, Mihaela
Olu, Kelechi K.
Tikkinen, Kari A. O.
Neumann, Ignacio
Carrasco-Labra, Alonso
Faulhaber, Markus
Mulla, Sohail M.
Mertz, Dominik
Akl, Elie A.
Bassler, Dirk
Busse, Jason W.
Ferreira-González, Ignacio
Lamontagne, Francois
Nordmann, Alain  
Gloy, Viktoria  
Raatz, Heike  
Moja, Lorenzo
Rosenthal, Rachel  
Ebrahim, Shanil
Vandvik, Per O.
Johnston, Bradley C.
Walter, Martin A.
Burnand, Bernard
Schwenkglenks, Matthias  
Hemkens, Lars G.  
Bucher, Heiner C.  
Guyatt, Gordon H.
Briel, Matthias  
Disco, Study Group
DOI
10.1136/bmj.g4539
Abstract
To investigate the planning of subgroup analyses in protocols of randomised controlled trials and the agreement with corresponding full journal publications.; Cohort of protocols of randomised controlled trial and subsequent full journal publications.; Six research ethics committees in Switzerland, Germany, and Canada.; 894 protocols of randomised controlled trial involving patients approved by participating research ethics committees between 2000 and 2003 and 515 subsequent full journal publications.; Of 894 protocols of randomised controlled trials, 252 (28.2%) included one or more planned subgroup analyses. Of those, 17 (6.7%) provided a clear hypothesis for at least one subgroup analysis, 10 (4.0%) anticipated the direction of a subgroup effect, and 87 (34.5%) planned a statistical test for interaction. Industry sponsored trials more often planned subgroup analyses compared with investigator sponsored trials (195/551 (35.4%) v 57/343 (16.6%), P<0.001). Of 515 identified journal publications, 246 (47.8%) reported at least one subgroup analysis. In 81 (32.9%) of the 246 publications reporting subgroup analyses, authors stated that subgroup analyses were prespecified, but this was not supported by 28 (34.6%) corresponding protocols. In 86 publications, authors claimed a subgroup effect, but only 36 (41.9%) corresponding protocols reported a planned subgroup analysis.; Subgroup analyses are insufficiently described in the protocols of randomised controlled trials submitted to research ethics committees, and investigators rarely specify the anticipated direction of subgroup effects. More than one third of statements in publications of randomised controlled trials about subgroup prespecification had no documentation in the corresponding protocols. Definitive judgments regarding credibility of claimed subgroup effects are not possible without access to protocols and analysis plans of randomised controlled trials.
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

bmj.g4539.full.pdf

Size

1.42 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):6370e9596481b188e9b117141f048ad3

University of Basel

edoc
Open Access Repository University of Basel

  • About edoc
  • About Open Access at the University of Basel
  • edoc Policy

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement