Repository logo
Log In
  1. Home
  2. Unibas
  3. Publications
  4. Efficacy and tolerability of artemisinin-based and quinine-based treatments for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in pregnancy: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis
 
  • Details

Efficacy and tolerability of artemisinin-based and quinine-based treatments for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in pregnancy: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

Date Issued
2020-01-01
Author(s)
Saito, Makoto
Mansoor, Rashid
Kennon, Kalynn
Anvikar, Anupkumar R.
Ashley, Elizabeth A.
Chandramohan, Daniel
Cohee, Lauren M.
D'Alessandro, Umberto
Genton, Blaise  
Gilder, Mary Ellen
Juma, Elizabeth
Kalilani-Phiri, Linda
Kuepfer, Irene
Laufer, Miriam K.
Lwin, Khin Maung
Meshnick, Steven R.
Mosha, Dominic
Mwapasa, Victor
Mwebaza, Norah
Nambozi, Michael
Ndiaye, Jean-Louis A.
Nosten, François
Nyunt, Myaing
Ogutu, Bernhards
Parikh, Sunil
Paw, Moo Kho
Phyo, Aung Pyae
Pimanpanarak, Mupawjay
Piola, Patrice
Rijken, Marcus J.
Sriprawat, Kanlaya
Tagbor, Harry K.
Tarning, Joel
Tinto, Halidou
Valéa, Innocent
Valecha, Neena
White, Nicholas J.
Wiladphaingern, Jacher
Stepniewska, Kasia
McGready, Rose
Guérin, Philippe J.
DOI
10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30064-5
Abstract
Malaria in pregnancy affects both the mother and the fetus. However, evidence supporting treatment guidelines for uncomplicated (including asymptomatic) falciparum malaria in pregnant women is scarce and assessed in varied ways. We did a systematic literature review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and tolerability of different artemisinin-based or quinine-based treatments for malaria in pregnant women.; We did a systematic review of interventional or observational cohort studies assessing the efficacy of artemisinin-based or quinine-based treatments in pregnancy. Seven databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Literatura Latino Americana em Ciencias da Saude) and two clinical trial registries (International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched. The final search was done on April 26, 2019. Studies that assessed PCR-corrected treatment efficacy in pregnancy with follow-up of 28 days or more were included. Investigators of identified studies were invited to share data from individual patients. The outcomes assessed included PCR-corrected efficacy, PCR-uncorrected efficacy, parasite clearance, fever clearance, gametocyte development, and acute adverse events. One-stage IPD meta-analysis using Cox and logistic regression with random-effects was done to estimate the risk factors associated with PCR-corrected treatment failure, using artemether-lumefantrine as the reference. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42018104013.; Of the 30 studies assessed, 19 were included, representing 92% of patients in the literature (4968 of 5360 episodes). Risk of PCR-corrected treatment failure was higher for the quinine monotherapy (n=244, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 6·11, 95% CI 2·57-14·54, p<0·0001) but lower for artesunate-amodiaquine (n=840, 0·27, 95% 0·14-0·52, p<0·0001), artesunate-mefloquine (n=1028, 0·56, 95% 0·34-0·94, p=0·03), and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (n=872, 0·35, 95% CI 0·18-0·68, p=0·002) than artemether-lumefantrine (n=1278) after adjustment for baseline asexual parasitaemia and parity. The risk of gametocyte carriage on day 7 was higher after quinine-based therapy than artemisinin-based treatment (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 7·38, 95% CI 2·29-23·82).; Efficacy and tolerability of artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) in pregnant women are better than quinine. The lower efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine compared with other ACTs might require dose optimisation.; The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, ExxonMobil Foundation, and the University of Oxford Clarendon Fund.
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

20200910142057_5f5a1a2926b3d.pdf

Size

771 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):001329e6a4b865ca3bbf682b024ada99

University of Basel

edoc
Open Access Repository University of Basel

  • About edoc
  • About Open Access at the University of Basel
  • edoc Policy

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement