edoc

A worldwide comparison of the management of T1 and T2 anterior floor of the mouth and tongue squamous cell carcinoma - Extent of surgical resection and reconstructive measures

Kansy, Katinka and Mueller, Andreas Albert and Mücke, Thomas and Koersgen, Friederike and Wolff, Klaus Dietrich and Zeilhofer, Hans Florian and Hölzle, Frank and Pradel, Winnie and Schneider, Matthias and Kolk, Andreas and Smeets, Ralf and Acero, Julio and Haers, Piet and Ghali, G. E. and Hoffmann, Jürgen. (2017) A worldwide comparison of the management of T1 and T2 anterior floor of the mouth and tongue squamous cell carcinoma - Extent of surgical resection and reconstructive measures. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 45 (12). pp. 2097-2104.

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: https://edoc.unibas.ch/78393/

Downloads: Statistics Overview

Abstract

Introduction Microvascular surgery following tumor resection has become an important field of oral maxillofacial surgery (OMFS). Following the results on general aspects of current reconstructive practice in German-speaking countries, Europe and worldwide, this paper presents specific concepts for the management of resection and reconstruction of T1/T2 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the anterior floor of the mouth and tongue. Methods The DOESAK questionnaire was distributed in three different phases to a growing number of maxillofacial units worldwide. Within this survey, clinical patient settings were presented to participants and center-specific treatment strategies were evaluated. Results A total of 188 OMFS units from 36 different countries documented their treatment strategies for T1/T2 anterior floor of the mouth squamous cell carcinoma and tongue carcinoma. For floor of mouth carcinoma close to the mandible, a wide variety of concepts are presented: subperiosteal removal of the tumor versus continuity resection of the mandible and reconstruction ranging from locoregional closure to microvascular bony reconstruction. For T2 tongue carcinoma, concepts are more uniform. Conclusion These results demonstrate the lack of evidence and the controversy of different guidelines for the extent of safety margins and underline the crucial need of global prospective randomized trials on this topic to finally obtain evidence for a common guideline based on a strong community of OMFS units.
Faculties and Departments:03 Faculty of Medicine > Bereich Operative Fächer (Klinik) > Kopfbereich > Cleft lip and palate surgery (Müller)
03 Faculty of Medicine > Departement Klinische Forschung > Bereich Operative Fächer (Klinik) > Kopfbereich > Cleft lip and palate surgery (Müller)
UniBasel Contributors:Müller, Andreas A.
Item Type:Article, refereed
Article Subtype:Research Article
Publisher:Elsevier
ISBN:18784119
ISSN:1010-5182
e-ISSN:1878-4119
Note:Publication type according to Uni Basel Research Database: Journal article
Identification Number:
Last Modified:29 Sep 2020 07:01
Deposited On:29 Sep 2020 07:01

Repository Staff Only: item control page