edoc

In Defense of Narrative Authenticity

Leuenberger, Muriel. (2020) In Defense of Narrative Authenticity. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 29 (4). pp. 656-667.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Accepted Version
142Kb

Official URL: https://edoc.unibas.ch/73012/

Downloads: Statistics Overview

Abstract

This paper ties in with the ongoing debate on authenticity and the influence of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) on authenticity, in particular with the exchange between Pugh et al. and Nyholm and O’Neill. Both argue against a narrative approach to authenticity, which will be defended in this paper. First, it is shown that the critique they offer does not hold against a more refined view on narrativism. Second, a narrative approach to authenticity is introduced. To be authentic is to have a self-narrative 1) that is sustainable in the sense that it is easy to uphold because it is not in tension with one’s lived experience, and 2) that constitutes a well-defined person, which means that vastly different, more coherent and intelligible counternarratives are excluded. Third, the advantages of a narrative account of authenticity are discussed, including a short overview of the influence of DBS on narrative authenticity.
Faculties and Departments:04 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > Departement Künste, Medien, Philosophie > Fachbereich Philosophie > Theoretische Philosophie (Wild)
UniBasel Contributors:Leuenberger, Muriel
Item Type:Article, refereed
Article Subtype:Research Article
Publisher:Cambridge University Press
ISSN:0963-1801
e-ISSN:1469-2147
Note:Publication type according to Uni Basel Research Database: Journal article
Language:English
Related URLs:
edoc DOI:
Last Modified:07 Mar 2021 02:30
Deposited On:06 Oct 2020 08:28

Repository Staff Only: item control page