Leuenberger, Muriel. (2020) In Defense of Narrative Authenticity. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 29 (Special Issue 4). pp. 656-667.
|
PDF
- Accepted Version
142Kb |
Official URL: https://edoc.unibas.ch/73012/
Downloads: Statistics Overview
Abstract
This paper ties in with the ongoing debate on authenticity and the influence of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) on authenticity, in particular with the exchange between Pugh et al. and Nyholm and O’Neill. Both argue against a narrative approach to authenticity, which will be defended in this paper. First, it is shown that the critique they offer does not hold against a more refined view on narrativism. Second, a narrative approach to authenticity is introduced. To be authentic is to have a self-narrative 1) that is sustainable in the sense that it is easy to uphold because it is not in tension with one’s lived experience, and 2) that constitutes a well-defined person, which means that vastly different, more coherent and intelligible counternarratives are excluded. Third, the advantages of a narrative account of authenticity are discussed, including a short overview of the influence of DBS on narrative authenticity.
Faculties and Departments: | 04 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > Departement Künste, Medien, Philosophie > Fachbereich Philosophie > Theoretische Philosophie (Wild) |
---|---|
UniBasel Contributors: | Leuenberger, Muriel |
Item Type: | Article, refereed |
Article Subtype: | Research Article |
Publisher: | Cambridge University Press |
ISSN: | 0963-1801 |
e-ISSN: | 1469-2147 |
Note: | Publication type according to Uni Basel Research Database: Journal article |
Language: | English |
Identification Number: | |
edoc DOI: | |
Last Modified: | 01 Jun 2023 12:03 |
Deposited On: | 06 Oct 2020 08:28 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page