Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial? a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules

Gless, Sabine and Richter, Thomas, eds. (2019) Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial? a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules. Ius gentium, 74. Cham.

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: https://edoc.unibas.ch/70376/

Downloads: Statistics Overview


This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal framework in which exclusionary rules function in six legal systems: Germany, Switzerland, People's Republic of China, Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States. Part II is dedicated to selected issues identified as crucial for the assessment of exclusionary rules. These chapters highlight the delicate balance of interests required in the exclusion of potentially relevant information from a criminal trial and discusses possible approaches to alleviate the legal hurdles involved.
Faculties and Departments:02 Faculty of Law > Departement Rechtswissenschaften > Fachbereich Strafrecht > Ordinariat Strafrecht und Strafprozessrecht (Gless)
UniBasel Contributors:Gless, Sabine
Item Type:Book
Book Subtype:Edited Book
Number of Pages:395
Note:Publication type according to Uni Basel Research Database: Edited book
Identification Number:
Last Modified:17 Oct 2019 11:33
Deposited On:17 Oct 2019 11:24

Repository Staff Only: item control page