Faculties and Modularity

Hufendiek, Rebekka and Wild, Markus. (2015) Faculties and Modularity. In: The Faculties. Oxford, pp. 254-299.

PDF - Published Version

Official URL: http://edoc.unibas.ch/51718/

Downloads: Statistics Overview


While theorizing about mental faculties had been in decline throughout the nineteenth and early twentieth century, cognitivism and classical science brought back questions about the architecture of mind. Within this framework, Jerry Fodor developed a functionalist approach to what he called the “modularity of the mind.” While he believes that cognitive science can only explain the lower faculties of the mind, evolutionary psychology seizes on the notion of modularity and transforms it into the radical claim that the mind is modular all the way up. By comparison, recent approaches that take cognition to be embodied and situated have renewed the radical criticism of faculties or modules that was dominant from the nineteenth century onward. The concept of module is a naturalized successor of the traditional concept of faculty, as this chapter shows, and the debate about modules is centrally a debate about the possibility of naturalizing the mind.
Faculties and Departments:04 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences > Departement Künste, Medien, Philosophie > Fachbereich Philosophie > Theoretische Philosophie (Wild)
UniBasel Contributors:Hufendiek, Rebekka
Item Type:Book Section
Book Section Subtype:Further Contribution in a Book
Publisher:Oxford University Press
Series Name:Oxford Philosophical Concepts
Note:Publication type according to Uni Basel Research Database: Book item
Identification Number:
edoc DOI:
Last Modified:20 Jun 2018 14:54
Deposited On:25 Jan 2017 16:12

Repository Staff Only: item control page