edoc

Effectiveness and safety of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic therapy in lower respiratory tract infections in "real life": an international, multicenter poststudy survey (ProREAL)

Albrich, W. C. and Dusemund, F. and Bucher, B. and Meyer, S. and Thomann, R. and Kuhn, F. and Bassetti, S. and Sprenger, M. and Bachli, E. and Sigrist, T. and Schwietert, M. and Amin, D. and Hausfater, P. and Carre, E. and Gaillat, J. and Schuetz, P. and Regez, K. and Bossart, R. and Schild, U. and Mueller, B. and Pro, Real Study Team. (2012) Effectiveness and safety of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic therapy in lower respiratory tract infections in "real life": an international, multicenter poststudy survey (ProREAL). JAMA Internal Medicine, 172 (9). pp. 715-722.

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://edoc.unibas.ch/56710/

Downloads: Statistics Overview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In controlled studies, procalcitonin (PCT) has safely and effectively reduced antibiotic drug use for lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). However, controlled trial data may not reflect real life. METHODS: We performed an observational quality surveillance in 14 centers in Switzerland, France, and the United States. Consecutive adults with LRTI presenting to emergency departments or outpatient offices were enrolled and registered on a website, which provided a previously published PCT algorithm for antibiotic guidance. The primary end point was duration of antibiotic therapy within 30 days. RESULTS: Of 1759 patients, 86.4% had a final diagnosis of LRTI (community-acquired pneumonia, 53.7%; acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 17.1%; and bronchitis, 14.4%). Algorithm compliance overall was 68.2%, with differences between diagnoses (bronchitis, 81.0%; AECOPD, 70.1%; and community-acquired pneumonia, 63.7%; P > .001), outpatients (86.1%) and inpatients (65.9%) (P > .001), algorithm-experienced (82.5%) and algorithm-naive (60.1%) centers (P > .001), and countries (Switzerland, 75.8%; France, 73.5%; and the United States, 33.5%; P > .001). After multivariate adjustment, antibiotic therapy duration was significantly shorter if the PCT algorithm was followed compared with when it was overruled (5.9 vs 7.4 days; difference, -1.51 days; 95% CI, -2.04 to -0.98; P > .001). No increase was noted in the risk of the combined adverse outcome end point within 30 days of follow-up when the PCT algorithm was followed regarding withholding antibiotics on hospital admission (adjusted odds ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.44 to 1.55; P = .56) and regarding early cessation of antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.04; P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: This study validates previous results from controlled trials in real-life conditions and demonstrates that following a PCT algorithm effectively reduces antibiotic use without increasing the risk of complications. Preexisting differences in antibiotic prescribing affect compliance with antibiotic stewardship efforts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN40854211.
Faculties and Departments:03 Faculty of Medicine > Bereich Medizinische Fächer (Klinik) > Allgemeine innere Medizin AG > Argovia Professur für Medizin (Müller)
03 Faculty of Medicine > Departement Klinische Forschung > Bereich Medizinische Fächer (Klinik) > Allgemeine innere Medizin AG > Argovia Professur für Medizin (Müller)
UniBasel Contributors:Müller, Beat
Item Type:Article, refereed
Article Subtype:Research Article
Publisher:American Medical Association
ISSN:0003-9926
e-ISSN:1538-3679
Note:Publication type according to Uni Basel Research Database: Journal article
Identification Number:
Last Modified:30 Nov 2017 12:25
Deposited On:30 Nov 2017 12:25

Repository Staff Only: item control page